Archive for September, 2010

Going out on a limb for executive salaries in the non profit sector

Friday, September 24th, 2010

Kudos to Dan Pallotta for standing up for the non profit sector and the current negative sentiment about executive salaries!  In a recent Globe & Mail article entitled “Salary caps would cripple our charities” the prominent author of Uncharitable makes some pretty bold statements about Bill C-470, the Private Member’s Bill to cap executive salaries in the non profit sector at $250,000.  While on the one hand bold, his statements also point out some realities that many may not have thought of.  Like his book, this article ventures where many others have not dared to go.  

It was great to read someone being so candid.  I’ve never understood why it’s OK for professional coaches and athletes, celebrities, and private sector executives to earn exorbitant salaries.  As Pallotta points out, this is a sad commentary on society’s priorities. 

The charitable sector needs good leaders, and good leaders command good salaries, within reason of course.  It would be really unfortunate to see good leaders being forced to make the mutually exclusive choice Pallotta points out, between doing well and doing good. 

It will be interesting to see how well embraced Pallotta’s message is, or if people are even open to hearing it. It will also be interesting to see whether Bill C470 progresses any further.  What do you think about salary caps for the non profit sector in Canada?  Will this have the desired effect, or will it back-fire and result in the negative effects Pallotta points out?

Branding flexibility at work in not for profit

Friday, September 17th, 2010

This past weekend was the Weekend to End Women’s Cancers across Canada, formerly known as the Weekend to End Breast Cancer.  As someone who is interested both in branding and giving back, this change in name caught my attention and got me thinking.  

This is a bold move on their part, especially after successfully establishing the brand and the brand name – the Weekend to End Breast Cancer (and the Walk to End Breast Cancer).  The new mandate, which is to fight all women’s cancers, is the driving force behind this.  It will be interesting to see how long it takes for the new brand and name to become established, but with all the support and attention, I suspect it will just be a matter of time.  I do wonder whether the “original” walkers who came out to support the specific cause of breast cancer may have a harder time letting go because the new brand and the new mandate is now diluted and not as closely tied to their specific cause.  At the same time, this should help them appeal to a broader group of both participants and donors.  I do wonder, though, if it will diminish the male contingent of participants now that the focus is specifically gender-based, since breast cancer is a cancer that also affects men, and would have drawn out male participants.

It will be interesting to watch this unfold, both with the participants and the general public.  What do you think?

What’s in a name?

Friday, September 10th, 2010

As someone who’s gone through several naming and branding exercises in business, I believe I have a sense of what to look for in a name, at least traditionally…like that it should be short, easy to say, easy to spell, memorable, etc.  

Now, when you’re going through these naming exercises, you are generally thinking of consumers, and specifically consumers who can read, or at least speak.  But, a recent experience makes me think maybe not! 

While on holidays recently with my youngest (2 year-old) granddaughter, she was having a hard time saying my “name”, Granny Annie.  Instead, she was calling me “Granny Granny”.  She got the double-barrel part right, but not the distinction between the two names.  It was interesting that she got the hard part right with the “gr” sound, but not the easier “Annie” part.  I thought it was quite cute, and it also intrigued me why this might be the case.  While I’m not an early childhood development expert, and there’s probably some explanation for this from that perspective, it did make me think about branding/naming in general.  

If your name is not easy to pronounce, then people won’t get it right.  Instead, they will put their own spin on it, which you may or may not like (I’m OK with Granny Granny, for now!), and you will perhaps be creating a potential “barrier” for you in building your brand.  As an aside, I also wonder about this in the world of online branding and naming, with the proliferation of odd spellings and names that are created…will this be a branding hurdle/barrier, or is it in fact part of the brand?