Archive for March, 2010

Why employee communications matters in brand building

Friday, March 26th, 2010

I’ve always believed in the sheer power of “living the brand” internally, which is where effective employee communications can play such a powerful role.  Recently I asked my communications colleagues on LinkedIn what they thought the role of employee communications was in the context of brand-building.  My belief is that companies often overlook the role that employee communications plays.  The feedback from my colleagues was pretty much supported my thinking – that internal audiences are absolutely critical when building a brand. 

I’m going to go out on a limb and say that employees are in fact an organization’s most important asset.  Some may disagree and say it’s the brand, but what they forget is the critical role that employees play as part of the brand.  A brand is really about a promise or an experience, meaning the essence of the brand needs to live in everything the company does.  Employees have a huge role to play in this because how they represent the company impacts the brand’s reputation.  And that means employees, and the role of employee communications, is absolutely critical to brand success, and therefore business success. 

No matter how good a job you do at building your brand in the marketplace, it will all fall apart if your employees are not engaged and part of that brand – without them you have no brand.  So what does that mean?  That employees should be the first audience factored into communications, especially in times of crisis when it’s particularly important to engage them first – out of respect for them (since it’s likely consistent with a core value all organizations have, or should have), and because they can help (or hurt) you.  Employees can be one of your biggest points of leverage, if you engage them properly, at any time, crisis or otherwise.  Recognize and act on this, and you set yourself up for success.  Ignore it and you may set yourself up for failure.  

In building your brand you need employee buy-in, so it’s not about talking at them, it’s about engaging them and giving them the opportunity to provide input and be a source of important feedback about the brand.  This gives employees ownership, and also creates alignment with the brand/values.  In good organizations this then fosters accountability for living up to the brand, and in times of crisis, for supporting and defending the brand and reputation. 

In many ways, a company shows its true colors in the way it communicates with its employees.  Does it communicate much with employees?  What does it communicate about?  Is it transparent and authentic in its employee communications?  Is it honest and believable?  And, are its communications with employees straightforward and tangible, avoiding the common pitfalls of talking in jargon and the infamous “management speak”, which will turn employees off and potentially create cynics or “haters”, not the ambassadors or “evangelists” you really want to have on board.  

You have a real opportunity to enable your employees as brand ambassadors if you engage them and make them feel part of the brand, and then arm them with the right information to portray your business (and brand) in the proper light.  Think about it, how can you deliver or stand up for something you don’t buy into?  This should convince any organization that the engagement of employees right from the outset is important for both clearly understanding and communicating brand values. 

Here’s something else to think about.  Your employees also go home at night, socialize with friends, and interact with others who may have an opinion about or interest in your brand.  Don’t ever underestimate the power of a cocktail party conversation or a seemingly innocent interaction an employee may have “on their own time”.  You want to have them promoting your brand and exuding your brand values at every opportunity.  As an added bonus, by having internal buy-in to your brand values you will also have an easier time retaining your best people and recruiting individuals who will also share and promote your brand values going forward.  What else can you ask for? 

If this hasn’t convinced you of the importance of employee communications in brand building, and why employee communications matters, I’m not sure what will! 

P.S.  The same thinking applies for not-for-profits with respect to their very important volunteer base, who are in essence an extension of the employee base and therefore key ambassadors for the organization.

Canadian Confidence Crisis

Friday, March 19th, 2010

I have to admit as a Canadian I rolled my eyes and shook my head when I heard the Canadian Government was thinking about changing some of the words in our national anthem.  First, because there are more important things for our government to focus on.  And second, because you just don’t do that.  The national anthem is based in our history, our heritage – you simply don’t change that by tinkering with the words of an anthem which reflects this history.  

According to Wikipedia, a national anthem is a self-identifying musical symbol of a nation, with the general intent of connecting a national (person) with the idea of his or her nation.  If you really feel times have changed and you need to change this “connection” between the nation and the idea of our country, then pick a new song entirely.  I remember saying to my husband at the time that you’d never hear of the U.S. trying to change the words of their national anthem.  It made me wonder about our own self-confidence and need to “please”, and also made me feel somewhat disappointed in us as a nation.  Thankfully saner minds prevailed, and that was dropped, but it didn’t go unnoticed in the U.S.  

I hoped this little “bump” would be our best kept secret so the world wouldn’t begin to mock us and call attention to this as an example of one of the many stereotypes often associated with Canadians (which were showcased in the closing ceremonies of the Vancouver 2010 Olympics).  Boy was I surprised when I noticed a blog posting on this very topic (O Canada, Who Are You?) on the popular technology blog Technorati. That the anthem issue had been picked up and reported on outside of Canada was my first surprise, and disappointment.  And, that it was on a technology blog of all places really surprised me!  Regardless, the author Paul Sogge gave a very poignant history of Canada’s national anthem and in many ways educated me as a Canadian.  (I’d forgotten that our anthem was originally French, written by Calixa Lavallée).  Not only does Sogge point out that we’ve had a habit of if changing the words (in English) for a long time, but that from the very start the English words weren’t aligned with the French.  As a bilingual Canadian, I know it’s often hard to directly translate, but he does have a point.  

I’ll let you read the blog posting since it’s very informative (even if delivered by an American – an inquisitive one at that!), but I thought this statement was extremely powerful:  “at some point, you have to agree as a nation what it is you stand for.  That’s why it is called a national anthem and not a this-is-what-it-means-to-me improvisation”. 

Let’s stop the improvising with our anthem and focus on the right issues!

Football player sets an example putting education before sports

Friday, March 12th, 2010

I was moved the other day when I watched some CNN coverage about college football star Myron Rolle and his impending return to football – after taking a controversial break to focus on his education after receiving a Rhodes Scholarship

Interestingly, what moved me wasn’t his return to football, and hope to make the NFL draft – which was the focus of the coverage – but the fact that he had taken this break and chosen education over sports.  If you don’t know Myron Rolle, he is a Black American – the American stereotype for many professional sports stars these days.  I thought to myself “good for him”.  Unlike CNN, my angle on this story was that he – as a prominent college football star – was setting a good example for millions of American kids – particularly the Black American ones – showing them that school is important, and even more important than excelling at sports. 

This hit home even more when they showed a clip of Rolle heading into or out of practice, walking by a bunch of young kids hanging around for his autograph.  When he gave one of them his autograph he said to the kid “Do you know what RS stands for?” and then said “Rhodes Scholar” as he walked through a doorway.  I thought this was brilliant…he was taking the opportunity to focus on education, not just sports stardom!  Whether that was his intent or not, I don’t know, but I still thought it was powerful.  (Judging by the focus of his website, it was intentional.)  One criticism:  he probably missed an opportunity to really hammer home on the message by adding a one-liner description of what a Rhodes Scholar was, presuming that many would not know, and would therefore miss the point. 

Regardless, I thought it was a great “societal” message.  I hope that the media focus on whether he can convince people he’s committed to football despite his continued interest in furthering his education doesn’t overshadow the real message to kids – putting education first.   Good on you Myron!