Archive for November, 2009

Tiger Woods doesn’t make the cut…when it comes to crisis communications!

Monday, November 30th, 2009

Alan Stam beat me to the punch when he posed the following question: “How should Tiger Woods handle car crash questions?”  Ever since I’d heard of the infamous “taking out a fire hydrant and neighbour’s tree” incident at 2:35am, I was shaking my head about how the incident was being handled from a PR perspective.  It amazed me that someone as famous – and public – as Tiger Woods would not have a squeaky clean and stellar crisis communications plan kick into place.  Did he have the wrong team working for him, or was he not heeding their counsel?  

Regardless, he sure missed the basics of crisis communications, which is mind-boggling to me.  Sure he’s a “celebrity”, which would make you think he’d have the right plan kick into place, partly because he has the resources, and partly because he’d need to…for him, for his family, for his upcoming tournament, for his sponsors – it’s not just about him. 

He missed the basics of crisis communications from the very beginning.  First, he remained silent for so long, and then when he finally did issue a statement on his website, he was very vague with what he is saying.   Then, despite his apology and taking accountability for the accident, it was pretty “vanilla” – not to mention late – and not at all transparent given the shroud of secrecy.   I also didn’t think the “dig” at the end was very appropriate either, especially for someone of his supposed character.  Tiger Woods is now just leaving it to others to speculate, and that they are – especially in today’s world of social media where silence can kill (or have someone else create your story and message for you, meaning you lose control). 

Woods is a celebrity, which unfortunately means he has even less “privacy”, especially in today’s world of social media. Maybe he should have thought about that a bit before he got into his car at 2:35am and drove off in a manner capable of having him take out a fire hydrant, hit a neighbour’s tree and knock him unconscious.  If anyone else had done this it wouldn’t have made the news, but it was Tiger, and it did make the news.  His image is somewhat tarnished in my mind because of how he’s handled the situation.  It gives the impression that something is being hidden, which unfortunately as a celebrity, is hard to do, and often frowned-upon.  I’m waiting to see how this week unfolds and how he handles himself with his upcoming tournament…whether he plays, whether he still holds the press conference – oh and what he says (and refuses to say) at the press conference, if it takes place.  I think he can make up lost ground here, if he takes control and takes the opportunity (or makes it into an opportunity).  Time will tell I guess. 

So, do I think he got it wrong when it came to handling his crisis?  Yes.  Do I think his image will be hurt by this?  Yes, but to what degree is uncertain as it’s too early to tell.  Will he lose sponsors?  That’s the big question.  He is so big and so powerful that they may allow him a “gimme” this time around.  But, I think they will want answers and assurances that this is a blip (and not the beginning of a John Daley story).   

I do think this will become a classic case study of how not to handle a crisis!  Too bad it’s Tiger Woods setting the example!  So what do you think?

The Sheer Power – and Pervasiveness – of Social Media

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Two recent stories about Twitter have really resonated with me, further reinforcing the sheer power of social media – and Twitter in particular. 

The first is an unlikely story of police in the U.S. who arrested a man for refusing to use Twitter!  When I first read the headline, I thought it was the reverse – that someone had been arrested for something they had said while Tweeting.  Nope – it was the exact opposite.  In a nutshell, thirty-five (35) U.S. police units could not control a crowd of 3,000 awaiting the arrival of a Canadian teen pop singer for an album signing, which was ultimately cancelled because the crowd had become too unruly.   When an executive from the record label was asked by police to tweet in order to help disperse the crowd – and he refused – he was arrested for putting lives in danger and the public at risk.  What strikes me about this is that the police even thought of Twitter as a potential tactic to help them in being successful in their job, when their traditional means of crowd control were proving otherwise! 

 What does that say about the awareness level and pervasiveness of Twitter, and its perceived value as an important tool for communication within a social community?!?  That the police felt a simple tweet would calm down the crowd and arrested this guy for not tweeting shows the sheer power of social media – in this case Twitter!  

The second is the much-tweeted and blogged about topic of Twitter having changed its official question from “What are you doing?” to “What’s happening?”  The fact that there was as much blogging and commenting going on about this subtle – some may call it symbolic – change was amusing to me.  I think part of the issue was that Twitter sort of slipped it in without saying anything, and the Twitterati was perhaps not amused?!?! 

I’m sure most of us don’t really pay attention to the question when we actually go to tweet.  Instead, we’ve inherently come to understand what sorts of things we should be tweeting about.  So this change went unnoticed at first, and then people started to stop and take notice – and of course comment.  I found it amusing that there was this much “excitement” over the unannounced change.  That there was so much chatter about this again showed me the sheer power of social media…that the change would matter, that people would feel the need to talk about it, and that there was a venue for people to be talking about it and sharing thoughts.

Twitter’s explanation of the change – that it was part of the “growing up” process and reflected Twitter’s evolution from being more about personal status updates to a “source-agnostic information network” makes sense to me.  I agree with them that it probably won’t change the way people tweet or what they tweet about. 

As for me – a relative newbie to the Twitterati– the new question makes me feel a bit more comfortable about tweeting…because it seems like I am able to add more value with my tweets.   I recall at first feeling hesitant tweeting about “What are you doing?”.  Sure that might be of interest to people following me personally, but what about those following me from a business perspective?  In my view, most of the answers to the “What are you doing?” question felt like they would be more personal vs. business in nature, and therefore of little value or interest to my business audience.  Then, when I looked at what people were actually tweeting about, it was in fact a mixed bag…they were already answering the question “What’s happening?” – they had taken liberties already.

When you think about it, loosely interpreted, “What’s happening?” can cover both questions anyways – as a sort of higher order “uber” question.  Lance Armstrong is a good example.  Not only are his tweets both personal and business in nature, they also answer both questions.  So it really didn’t matter to him what the question was!

In the end, as Twitter says, I really don’t think it will change what people will tweet about.  Twitter is simply a platform for communication with understood guidelines for use, and if what is being tweeted about is relevant and meaningful to followers, they will follow – because they see value. It will be interesting to see what the next evolution is, especially as Twitter contemplates monetization.

Sometimes it’s not the question that matters, but the answer. I’d say that’s the case with Twitter.  So will it change the way you tweet?!?!?

J5PUCB75UQG3

Taming the lion – social media…

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Is anyone else out there finding that this social media thing is a bit overwhelming to “manage” and wrap your head (and arms) around?!?  Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, blogging, RSS feeds/following other blogs…

How could anyone possibly keep on top of things unless they made it a full-time job?!? 

As I’ve been spending time with social media I’ve come to realize just how time-consuming it can be, something which a lot of us may not be able to afford.  I like to feel organized and in control so that I can be effective with my time and in my work.  So in order to feel in control, I was trying to figure out how to cope with all of this social media monitoring/management, etc. – what sorts of systems/processes could I implement or draw on to simplify and organize things for me (hmmm – back to basics again!).  I had some of my own ideas once I had the “ah-ha” that I had to formalize how I was “doing” social media.  Then I discovered Mari Smith who is heralded as the Pied Piper of the Online World by FastCompany.  More specifically, I discovered a great video she has on YouTube called Facebook in 5 Minutes a Day.  The timing was perfect for me as I was trying to figure out how to create a plan/schedule to keep on top of all my social media so it became more manageable for me.  If you haven’t seen this video already it’s worth the 6 minutes it takes to watch. 

As for me, my days are more manageable now, but I’m sure there’s more I can figure out to be able to be even more effective in managing all these social media I’ve started to use!  Any and all tips, tricks and tools are appreciated, that’s for sure!  How are you coping with taming the lion of social media?!?!