Archive for the ‘Marketing’ Category

Giving back is a relative thing

Friday, September 3rd, 2010

With all the coverage we’ve been seeing lately about how the Giving Pledge has been picking up momentum in the global “billionaire” community, it got me thinking about philanthropy and giving back in general, and what it could mean depending on who you are.  While I had originally blogged on the topic of the Giving Pledge when it first came out in the news, I have a few additional thoughts on this I’d like to share. 

1. About the billionaire community going public with their pledges…I think it’s wonderful the momentum that is being created through “going public”, peer pressure and “branding” this as the Giving Pledge.  I hope it continues to pick up momentum around the world.  At the same time, I think we all need to be aware of the fact that this isn’t always net new giving, but just “going public” in order to help generate momentum and awareness.  For some, like Larry Ellison of Oracle, this philanthropy has already been in place but it’s been a very private matter.  It’s wonderful to see people like him willing to “go public” for the good of the cause of giving back.  It’s great to know that those who’ve done so well in business see that they have a responsibility of sorts to give back, and to influence others to give back.  I hope the charitable sector sees significant gain as a result of this.  

2. About the extendibility of the Giving Pledge…I wonder if we’ll see this “movement” extend to the world of Sports and Entertainment, where incomes – through salaries and sponsorships – are exorbitantly high.  I know that many already give back, but it would be great to see someone like George Clooney in the world of entertainment, or Steve Nash in the world of sports (at least for North America) make a bold statement and get some sort of Giving Pledge going in their worlds.  

3. About the average person…I wonder how much we’ll see the average person thinking about how they can do their part – in their own way – to give back a bit more.  While philanthropy is a very personal and relative thing, the possibilities are limitless.  It could be as small as a child emptying out his or her piggy bank every year and donating it to a cause, or asking for a donation or a gift for a charity for his/her birthday.  It could be becoming a regular monthly donor for a cause, or a regular sponsor – even if a small amount – of participants in various fundraising events.  It could something not financial at all, but simply being a volunteer or perhaps fundraising event participant who is raising awareness and funds for the cause, without being a donor.  And the list goes on. 

I know the charitable sector has been hit hard the last few years, so I hope that we do see a turn around, driven by everyone contributing in their own ways.  People should know that every little bit matters – it’s all relative, but it’s important.

Boldness and brilliance in branding and naming

Friday, August 27th, 2010

I may not be a tennis fanatic, but I do get interested in the major tournaments.  While watching the Rogers Cup men’s tennis recently on television, I noticed prominent sponsorship branding for lovemeansnothing.ca .  Generally at events of this nature you tend to see the bigger brands as advertisers and sponsors.  When I saw this “unknown” brand as what appeared to be a prominent sponsor, I was a bit surprised, and intrigued enough to want to check out the web site to see what it was all about.  I figured that I was either simply not in the know because I really didn’t follow tennis a lot, or that it was  a clever new competitor making a big (launch) move at a major tournament.  I didn’t get a chance to check out the site before I learned from the commentator that this was a new online tennis community web site.  What a great, relevant and clever name for it, and what a great venue for what appeared to be a launch! 

When I did get around to checking out the site I then saw that it was actually a Tennis Canada web site, but their branding was very “quiet”and secondary to the “LoveMean Nothing.ca” branding.  A lot of companies would want their branding to be prominent, but Tennis Canada was confident and wise enough to let the “LoveMeansNothing.ca brand dominate.  After all, people going to this site aren’t necessarily going because they are interested in Tennis Canada, but because they are interested in being part of a tennis community.  The Tennis Canada branding may serve as an endorsement and credibility booster for the new brand, at least in the short term until the new brand and community establishes itself.  Who knows what will happen with the branding over time, but kudos to Tennis Canada for the creative branding approach and for their confidence to stand down and let the real brand shine!  Add that to the National Bank’s bold branding that I blogged about last week, and it’s “thirty – love” for branding at the Rogers Cup men’s tennis this year!

Branding confidence and flexibility

Friday, August 20th, 2010

I’m always intrigued when I see how companies “manage” (or not) their brands – particularly since the Internet gained momentum and the power/control shifted to the consumer, whether companies accepted this fact or not.  Those of us who were involved in branding in the pre-Internet days had it drummed into us that you had to vigilantly “control” your brand or lose equity and the power of your brand.   So I know that many companies and brands struggled to keep control of their brands and build equity in them, often times going about it the wrong way.  

This weekend while spending a lot of time watching the Rogers Cup men’s tennis on television, I noticed that presenting sponsor, the National Bank, “got it” with their brand, and particularly their logo.  As presenting sponsor to an event that already has a title sponsor, it’s a difficult enough to ensure your brand has prominence.  I thought the National Bank did a great job, in many ways by letting go of their brand and letting it become relevant to the event it was associated with.  The use of the red and white tennis balls in their TV advertising – particularly when they ended up forming their logo – was a wonderfully confident and relevant flexing of their brand so that it was both relevant to the event and yet true to the brand.  I don’t know that you would have seen this 5 or so years ago, and I suspect that many companies would still hold onto their brand and brand standars for dear life in order to “protect” and promote their brand.  This shows that letting go and being flexible can in fact help a brand to break through and be relevant – kudos to the National Bank!